It is no secret that for decades, tobacco companies have filled disadvantaged communities with advertising and marketing attracting generations of young people of color to the products they peddle.
A new report from the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health finds that alcohol companies are taking a page from the tobacco industry’s playbook.
Specifically, we found African-American youths ages 12-20 are seeing more advertisements for alcohol in magazines and on TV, compared with all youths ages 12-20. In fact, over the study period, African-American youths saw 32 percent more alcohol advertising than all youths in national magazines, and 17 percent more television advertising, including 20 percent more exposure to distilled spirits advertising. On radio, while black youths heard less alcohol advertising overall, they were exposed to 32 percent more ads for distilled spirits products.
Here in Baltimore, from 2009 through 2011, alcohol advertisers placed an average of 11,000 radio commercials and 1,000 TV commercials per year, at an annual average cost of about $1 million. That’s on top of the national TV advertising that surrounds Baltimore’s youths — including many ads for hard liquor on cable TV.
The overexposure is a result of two key phenomena. First, many brands are specifically targeting African-American audiences; and second, African-American media habits make that population more vulnerable to alcohol advertising in general because of greater exposure to media.
This increased exposure comes with a huge cost: At least 14 long-term studies have found that the more young people are exposed to alcohol advertising and marketing, the more likely they are to drink, or if they are already drinking, to drink more. Alcohol is already the most widely used drug among African-American youths, and it is associated with violence, motor vehicle crashes and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Some factors in the black community are protective against drinking problems, such as generally lower incomes and higher levels of religiosity. However, alcohol advertising exposure is a risk factor pointing in the wrong direction for African-American youths.
The influence of the alcohol industry on young people of color is not limited to ads on television and in magazines they are more likely to watch and read. A study conducted by colleagues at the Bloomberg School found that in Baltimore, liquor stores are disproportionately located in predominantly black census tracts, even after controlling for census tract socioeconomic status. Census tracts that are both low income and predominantly African-American have substantially more liquor stores per capita than other census tracts and have the worst health outcomes and highest mortality rates from homicide.
And as we see with media exposure, the prevalence of liquor stores produces serious consequences. Published data about Baltimore show not only an inequitable distribution of liquor stores in predominantly African-American and low-income communities, but also significant associations between the presence of liquor stores and the risk of health-related problems. Specifically, communities with a greater density of liquor stores have higher levels of drinking, unintentional injuries, crime and violence. And while it’s difficult to prove causality because many risk factors overlap, a 2010 study conducted in Washington, D.C., found that community-level liquor outlet density is significantly associated with assaultive violence, independent of other neighborhood factors including violent crime, and the prevalence of weapons and illicit drugs.