Larissa Dann blog post May 2015Photo:Shutterstock
Children and discipline – a perennial issue. Discipline (the verb) can mean either ‘to teach’, or ‘to control’ (Gordon, T. 1989). If we use discipline to control children, then we rely on reward and punishment to change a child’s behaviour.
This article questions the use of one of the most commonly used discipline (punishment) techniques – time-out. Many schools, childcare centres and parents rely on time-out to discipline children.
What is time-out?
Time-out is when a child is excluded from being with others for a certain period of time, as a punishment for their behaviour. They may stay in the same room (say, the ‘naughty corner), or be moved to another room for a certain period of time.
The parent or carer controls when and where the child goes to time-out, and when the child is allowed to return to the class or family. The child is powerless.
The effects of time-out
Time-out and isolation, ostracism and self-concept
When a child is excluded from interacting with others (time-out), they are effectively ostracised (isolated from relationship) by those more powerful than them – parents and teachers.
Recent brain research suggests that isolating people from others important to them causes ‘relational pain’. Relational pain travels the same neural paths in our brain as physical pain or illness (Siegel, D. and Bryson, T. 2014). Is time-out really a gentle alternative to smacking, when the child has a similar physical experience of both punishments?
Ostracism studies in adult relationships found that excluding people threatens the needs of self-esteem, belonging, control and meaningful existence (Williams, K, 2007). If this is the effect on adults, how much greater is the impact of social isolation on children?
Excluding a child from family/class activity, while keeping the child in the same room (‘quiet time’), is perceived as a ‘softer’ punishment than banishment to another room. However, quiet time may in fact, be more harmful. A child essentially becomes ‘invisible’. Not being acknowledged, the public shame of exclusion, feeling as though you don’t exist . . .this is a potentially devastating experience for a child.
Time-out does not teach social and emotional life skills
“What’s done to children, they will do to society” (Karl A. Menninger). Remember – discipline means ‘to teach’. Time-out is a method of resolving conflict between a caregiver and a child. What do teachers or parents model when they use their power to isolate a child? How will a child put time-out into practice when playing with friends, or in future adult relationships?
Children subjected to time-out by their parents or teachers may, in turn, use their power to bully by excluding their peers or siblings.
Time-out does not seek to understand the reason for the behaviour
When we use time-out to punish a child for misbehaving, we forget to look for the unmet need that led to the behaviour. They may have been bullied at school, or they may simply be tired and hungry. Have we then lost an opportunity to understand and connect with our child?
Time-out and divorce, separation and trauma
Consider the potential effect of time-out on children whose parents have separated or are separating, who have been adopted or fostered, who have separation anxiety or are affected by trauma. Time-out with these children may exacerbate feelings of abandonment, rejection or confusion.
Children need connection, not isolation. They need to be held in a safe space (physically and emotionally), in relationship, to help heal the hurt.
Alternatives to time-out include:
- Replace the use of rewards and punishment with positive relationship skills, including no-lose conflict resolution. Courses such as Parent Effectiveness Training (P.E.T.) teach how to avoid rewards and punishment; to communicate respectfully with children; and help them build an inner discipline.
- ‘Time-in’ – being with and enjoying the company of children, giving them love and attention, remembering what you like about them, and letting them know. Delight in the little person who is in your care.
References:
Gordon, T, 1989. Teaching Children Self Discipline: At Home and at School. 1st ed. America: Random House.
Daniel J Siegel & Tina Payne Bryson. 2014. Time-outs Are Hurting Your Child. [ONLINE] Available at: http://time.com/3404701/discipline-time-out-is-not-good/. [Accessed 27 April 15].
Williams, Kipling (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology.
Larissa has taught P.E.T. for over 17 years, and utilised the P.E.T. skills and concepts as a parent for more than 20 years. Her website, www.parentskills.com.au, contains an extended version of this article, and reflects her passion for empowering children, parents and carers in a relationship of respect.
I think time out is valuable only when a child has lost his or her temper and needs time to calm down and gather themselves together. I agree that as a punishment it really does nothing except to promote the feeling of exclusion. I like the type of “time outs” when the child is permitted to decide when he/ she is ready to rejoin the group and feels able to tolerate the interaction in a non angry manner.
Thank you Anne. I agree – I call this ‘time away’, when children can re-group and have control over when they return – as you describe. I remember Louise Porter describing friendly, cushion filled spaces some teachers had in their class rooms, for children to go when they felt overwhelmed, and stay until they could cope again.
As aGP of 40years ‘ experience ,as a mother and grandmother, I can hardly believe the claims of this article , that pain equivalent to physical pain is experienced by the child placed into”time out”!! If the time is short, it can emphasise to the child the boundaries they have to learn AND they are NOT yet adults or have mature mindsIf 99.9% of the time they are embraced with love and inclusiveness by their family , they will not feel rejected or abandoned.
Such rubbish seems to be presented these days as “enlightened advice”
Thank you for sharing your experience, and broadening the conversation. I think that, overall, a mutually respectful and warm relationship between parents and their children, will provide the foundation for guiding our children.
I agree with your comments about time in and time away Larissa. Children need respect and good modeling from their parents regardless of their age or their apparent maturity. From what I can see, modelling this non-punitive approach to discipline in our homes and schools is the best chance we have of creating higher standards of inclusion and belonging in our workplaces and communities
Thank you, Janine. I really like the emphasis you’ve put on modelling inclusion, broadening the effects to workplaces and community.
Is it your claim that every instance of misbehaving is the result of an unmet need? I suppose if that’s the case I’m just going to have to disagree with the philosophy that its the parents’ job to identify and fill that need. Sure, there could be certain significant psychological issues as the ones you mentioned, but by and large I believe your basic every day misbehaving is just a matter of acting on a desire and the parents’ job is to present the guiding rules of our society and to teach restraint and self control. For example, I wanted to reply in a much more crude and insulting manner, but after evaluating that option I decided it was not the best choice. My parents taught me that 🙂